|
International human rights law is part of international law. There is a close relationship between international humanitarian law (IHL) and international human rights law. International human rights law codifies human rights in various international treaties. The right to life, the right to freedom of thought and expression and the right to health and housing are examples of human rights. ApplicabilityInternational human rights law is applicable to the territory of a state but also extends to any territory which is under its effective jurisdiction, even if it is outside its borders. Effective jurisdiction refers to the de facto level of control of one state over another territory or people, for example during an occupation. Derogations and limitations of human rights lawIn exceptional cases, such as in times of public emergency which threaten the life of the nation, a state can derogate (temporarily depart) from some of its obligations under human rights law. A derogation from a right means that the right is suspeeded for a certain period of time. An example of a right that can be derogated from under times of emergency is the right to peaceful assembly. The derogation must be proportional and must not be introduced on a discriminatory basis. Certain human rights can be limited, but only if such limitations are provided for by law and necessary for the protection of national security or public safety etc. Contrary to a derogation the right is not taken away but continues to be valid, however, in a limited manner. Examples of rights which can be limited are the right to freedom of expression and the freedom of association. Fundamental human rights, such as the right to life and the prohibition on torture and slavery, can never be derogated from or limited. The relation to international humanitarian law (IHL)The International Court of Justice (ICJ)in its Advisory Opinion on the Wall of July 2004 considered the inter-relation between the two bodies of law – international humanitarian law and human rights law. It concluded that when dealing with a situation of armed conflict, IHL is lex specialis (governs a specific subject matter) while human rights law, which is applicable both in times of armed conflict and in times of peace, governs general matters. It elaborated three possible inter-relations between the two bodies of law:
Therefore, each action needs to be examined under IHL, human rights law or both together depending on the circumstances.
|
|